Wikipedia says,
The principle of toleration is controversial. Liberal critics may see in it an inappropriate implication that the “tolerated” custom or behavior is an aberration or that authorities have a right to punish difference; such critics may instead emphasize notions such as civility or pluralism. Other critics, some sympathetic to traditional fundamentalism condemn toleration as a form of moral relativism. On the other hand, defenders of toleration may define it as involving positive regard for difference or, alternately, may regard a narrow definition of the term as more specific and useful than its proposed alternatives, since it does not require false expression of enthusiasm for groups or practices that are genuinely disapproved of.
Navigating through everyone’s ideas of reality and god without getting upset or upsetting them is hard. What do you do? Does it matter? Are you supposed to discuss that stuff if you know already that you will not, so to speak, improve your understanding or their understanding by getting into a “discussion”?
I have this idea about religion. It goes like this: believe whatever it is that makes you feel awesome but never talk about it and everyone will be happy. (The topic should be about as taboo as masturbating for 13 year old girls. In fact, I vote that every time you think about saying something nonsecular, instead, try to make the world more forgiving to pubescent females.)
My opinion about religion sort of follows the same train of thought as my friend’s idea of physical activity, or “exercising”: it’s not a topic for discussion. Do whatever it is that you do privately. Don’t talk about it to people. It’s inappropriate. It’s super boring. It’s your own personal biznis. More or less everyone has their own concept of how it should be done.
But for some reason exercising alone is not that satisfying and needs to be augmented by some sort of positive feedback or reassurance that you are doing the right thing. With exercise, the motivation to announce your routine, or adherence to the collective concept of “healthy active living”, is propelled by an urge to demonstrate to your peers that you know about, and follow through on, what is right and good (and hot). “I’ve been exercising.”, actually means, “Please congratulate me because I just found out that the only real reason I do it is for praise.” If exercise is so great and has changed your life in such a positive way, just be glad you found out before you got type 2 diabetes. It’s not that satisfying, I know, but constantly telling you how much of a difference it’s made in you is super tedious and I want to die every time you talk about it. Please let’s all acknowledge that exercising is really boring actually, but if we think it’s a good idea for us to do, we can do it and just accept that not everything is packed with revelations at all times.
Same with god. Volunteering information that pertains to religion, unsolicited, is annoying no matter what the awesome tenets are or how good it is for a sense of community. Everyone should shut the fuck up and smile at their neighbours, look at the immensely beautiful sky or buy a croissant with chocolate on it.